Hampshire Mills Group
HOME
Up
MEMBERSHIP
NEWSLETTERS
MILLS BOOKS
MILLS OPEN
LIBRARY
LISTED MILLS
MILL HISTORY
SNIPPETS
MILLS OVERSEAS
LINKS

 

 

Back Up

Page 6

Newsletter 130 Autumn  2020   © Hampshire Mills Group

 

 

Cotton Mills of Greater Manchester

 

Ruth Andrews

 

In 1985 the Royal Commission of the Historical Monuments of England (RCHME) started a survey to assess the historical importance and serious threats that northern textile mills faced in the modern world. Three surveys were published in 1992 and I possess two of them: Greater Manchester and Yorkshire. Although I grew up in Middleton in Manchester, my parents moved to Milnrow on the outskirts of Rochdale, and before that we had spent time walking in the Pennines. So I knew some of the mills referred to in both books. However, to make things easier, this article is about Lancashire cotton mills.

The industry began in the 1780s (yes, it was the industrial revolution!) and rapidly expanded from water-powered sites in the humid atmosphere of the Pennines to huge steam-powered edifices surrounded by a dense urban sprawl of workers housing.

The presence of abundant coal reserves and canals lining the Manchester area to Liverpool allowed the easy import of American cotton in the early 19th century. However, this ceased suddenly during the cotton famine caused by the American Civil War in the 1860s, and Egypt and India became important sources of the raw material.

Some of the oldest existing cotton-spinning mills are in the Ancoats area of Manchester, for instance Brownsfield of 1825 and Murrays Old Mill and Decker of 1798-1802, both of which were on the banks of the Rochdale Canal, which provided cooling water for their steam power as well as transport for their raw materials and finished goods. The whole of Ancoats, which has been called the world's first industrial suburb is now a conservation area, and the mill buildings have been refurbished. When I was young it was definitely a no-go area.

 

Brownsfield was built as a ‘room and power’ mill, where space was leased to individual operators.  By the end of the 19th century it was used by a large number of small firms in a wide range of trades.  The heavy timber flooring was not fireproof.  It had an internal engine house with power transmission via upright drive shafts and line shafts attached to columns.  It also had an external combined chimney and stair tower, which is now Manchester’s oldest surviving mill chimney.

 

The Murrays Mills complex comprised four multi-storeyed blocks erected in phases between 1798 and 1806.  It had 84000 mule spindles and 1300 operatives.  The whole complex was also of non-fireproof construction with joisted timber floors supported on slender cast iron crucifix section columns, supporting line shafting from the upright drive shafts.  Externally all these early mills had very little embellishment.

 

The view from the canal shows, right to left, Decker Mill (1802), Old Mill (1798) – a continuous row – Sedgwick Mill (1818-20),  and Royal Mill (1912).  In the picture below left, they are seem from the other end.  On the right below is the back of Decker Mill and Old Mill, with the separate engine house and the remains of the canal basin.
 

 

 

To accommodate the many hundreds of workers, very dense shoddily built cramped back-to-back houses were built, with a very limited number of shared outside privies and water pumps.  The whole area became a squalid and insanitary slum.  In the 1870s the area was cleared and replaced by terraces of 2- and 3-storey houses with indoor facilities.  To celebrate this new found cleanliness, the city council proudly named one of them Sanitary Street (pictured).  By the 1960s, the residents hated the name and so they suggested that it could be easily fixed by some white paint, which was agreed:  so SANITARY STREET became SANITARY STREET !

 

By the 1880s most new mills were being built in towns such as Oldham where integrated spinning and weaving mills were being replaced by specialised firms who commissioned architects such as Stott & Sons.  The mills were often red brick, with ornamental features, which gave them a distinctive appearance.  Stair towers often contained a large iron water tank for the mills’ sprinkler system.  Improvements in floor construction allowed for wide mills which required larger windows and could accommodate wider spinning mules.

 

 

Anchor Mill (1881) in Oldham was designed by Joseph Stott.  It had an integrated engine house (behind the arched window on the left), an external boiler house next to it, and a freestanding chimney with an anchor motif.  It also had a cellar for conditioning finished yarn, and the ground floor included a preparation room at the back of the mill for bale opening and breaking, and carding.  This extended beyond the upper floors which housed the spinning mules.

 

 

Chadderton Mill (1885) was the first mill designed by Sidney Stott after he left the Stott partnership.  Like Anchor Mill, it has very large windows;  these were made possible because of the improved fireproof brick arch system for supporting the floors.

All of these were spinning mills;  weaving took place either in an adjacent building (as at Facit Mill – see page 14) or at another location.  A distinctive architecture of single-storey weaving sheds with northern light roofs developed.  Looms were much heavier than spinning mules and caused more vibration, so they were usually located at ground level.

 

 

Back Up


HOME ] Up ] MEMBERSHIP ] NEWSLETTERS ] MILLS BOOKS ] MILLS OPEN ] LIBRARY ] LISTED MILLS ] MILL HISTORY ] SNIPPETS ] MILLS OVERSEAS ] LINKS ]

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2020 Hampshire Mills Group
Registered as a Charity - 1116607